Why Apps?
In FrontMCP, apps provide domain boundaries and enable multi-tenant architectures:
Apps are ideal for:
- Feature domains — billing, users, analytics as separate concerns
- Team boundaries — each team owns their app
- Multi-tenant — isolate per customer with
splitByApp: true - Third-party integrations — wrap OpenAPI adapters per service
Minimal App
App options
Scoping & auth
- If the server uses
splitByApp: true, each app is isolated and must configure its own auth (server-levelauthis disallowed). standalone: truemakes the app expose its own scope/entry;'includeInParent'lists it under the parent while keeping isolation.
- Providers resolve tool → app → server.
- Plugins/adapters attach at app scope; generated items inherit the app’s policies and provenance.
Example: app with adapter + providers
Remote Apps
Connect to external MCP servers and proxy their tools, resources, and prompts through your gateway:Remote App Options
Transport Options
Caching Remote Tools
Remote tools don’t have cache metadata, so use thetoolPatterns option in CachePlugin:
Use Cases for Remote Apps
MCP Gateway
Aggregate multiple MCP servers behind a single endpoint with unified authentication
Service Mesh
Connect to internal microservices running as separate MCP servers
Third-Party Integration
Proxy external MCP services like Mintlify, adding caching and rate limiting
Development
Test against local MCP servers running on different ports
Best Practices
Do:- Use descriptive
idvalues that work as URL segments - Group related tools, resources, and prompts in the same app
- Configure
standalone: truewhen apps need isolated auth - Use adapters to generate tools from OpenAPI specs
- Put unrelated functionality in the same app
- Mix authentication strategies within a single app
- Create apps with only one tool (use the server directly)